Post Jobs


The testing done here could help answer my question since I am guessing the 10 year old drivers were all used clubs. It feels really solid and stable, with weight positioned further apart than in any other r7 incarnation. I think it would be great to add an old driver to all of the Most Wanted driver tests to put it in perspective. They make them with a lower CG to get the ball in the air with lower lofts so that they travel further. Keep the great articles coming. Jon Brittan 2 years ago. It was a big decision, but the M2, for me, was the right choice.

Uploader: Jujora
Date Added: 7 August 2004
File Size: 12.50 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 59480
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

I loved my r7 super quad until after hitting a drive I cracked the sole of the driver from one end to the other. When the courses dry out in the summer and the air is lighter the ball will travel tsylor due to aerodynamics and will still hit a hard fair way and rollout.

TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad

To say 15 yards is worth dollars is madness just hit it harder…!!! Seamus Crawford 2 years ago.

Again i had my previous driver for years. I always loved this club so Taylormade was the first manufacturer i looked at to replace my beloved outlaw.

TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad

A true test of 10 years ago vs now, guessing 20 yards difference? So for tyalor, take 2 swings at identical speeds and absolutely identical impact location.

New Drivers  VOSTRO 1550 WIFI DRIVER

If anything, the R felt more solid with a better more piercing ball flight. That has allowed manufacturers to challenge previous boundaries of what is possible from a center of gravity standpoint.

For testing, stock shaft v. Number of bids and bid amounts may be slightly out of date.

None of these drivers were custom superquae. Hi Tony, Thanks for the reply. We loved hitting it and got admiring looks as we pounded shots down the range. If you had a Dell SX computer and you broke it now, do expect them to give you an exact replacement??!

TaylorMade R7 Superquad Driver

No way as the face marks very easily with pap balls and in a few months will start to look tatty. And holy hell, did it perform. Since when is stock shaft vs stock shaft not a good comparison?

Pretty large scrape on back edge shown in photos. Obviously the initial launch angle is a major factor in carry when spin is low. These irons are exclusively for the higher HC player in mind to give them as much help as they can. The only instances that really come to mind that suprequad really make a difference are a short par 5 where an extra 10 yds could allow you to get to the green in 2, or a short par 4 where an extra 10 yds could get you to the green in 1.

TaylorMade r7 SuperQuad Driver Review | Equipment Reviews | Today’s Golfer

But by all means, keep gaming the old stuff, leave those yards on the table, while continuing to argue that your Cleveland Launcher still out drives anything on the market today. It was solid through impact and gave the ball a good penetrating flight, but it did not do anything else my current driver can’t do. Thank you for the free, factual and unbiased information!


I got 20 more yards from it. How many new versions has TM introduced over that 10 year period, and what were the total yardage improvements claimed by the Marketing Department??

So all other factors equal, the driver that produces the greater spin loft will also produce the straighter ball flight. Dunny Budgie 2 years ago.

Or better yet, both drivers should have results in both high and low settings and compare the optimal numbers. I still use the R7 stiff and wouldnt change if for the world, so tqylor i may be 14 yards behind the M1 but sometime you can be too long! It was Burrows Mac Powerspere with an inverted cone in the bottom of the head.

OK, time to chime in. Bobby Jordan 2 years ago.